SCOTUS 7-2 ruling: for alleged cyberstalkers’ words to be “true threats”, a court must prove a person recklessly disregarded that the words were seen as threats (Issie Lapowsky/Fast Company)

SCOTUS 7-2 ruling: for alleged cyberstalkers’ words to be “true threats”, a court must prove a person recklessly disregarded that the words were seen as threats (Issie Lapowsky/Fast Company)

Issie Lapowsky / Fast Company:
SCOTUS 7-2 ruling: for alleged cyberstalkers’ words to be “true threats”, a court must prove a person recklessly disregarded that the words were seen as threats  —  The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that in order to find someone guilty of making a “true threat” …

0Shares